Card Counting in Australia
The effect of card removal at the game of Blackjack, and counter measures casinos employ to prevent exploitation by players in Australia. By Andrew MacDonald Gaming Manager, Casino Operations, Adelaide Casino, 1994 |
Introduction | Brief Overview | Card Counting Legalities (Precedents) | Counter Measures | Profit Analysis | Sensitivity Analysis (%profit) | Conclusion | Bibliography | Blackjack Simulation- Experiment- December 1990 | Experiment Conclusion |
AIM:-
To quantify by computer simulation the house edge at the game of Blackjack played under Adelaide Casino rules, where all players utilise basic strategy. To compare this result with a house edge calculated using Arnold Snyder’s “Blackjack Formula”.
METHOD:-
John H Imming’s Blackjack software, “Universal Blackjack Engine Version 4.0” (U.B.E.) was configured to the following settings:-
Rules
1. Cards dealt face down 2. Dealer shows burn card 3. Real World pick up 4. Pickup type 2 5. Dealer hits on soft 17 6. Surrender allowed 7. Early surrender 8. Macao surrender 9. Insurance allowed 10. Dealer blackjack takes all 11. No hole card game 12. Dealer peek on aces only 13. No dealer peek 14. Split any 2 tens 15. D.D.N. on any number of cards 16. Over/under 17. Double exposure 18. Double down after split 19. Only 1 split allowed 20. Cards for split as played 21. Aces split exactly as others 22. One card for split aces 23. Resplit for Aces 24. Blackjack pays 1 1/2 times 25. Blackjack pays 60% bonus 26. Blackjack pays double 27. Dealer takes all ties 28. Dealer takes tie 17 29. Player wins on 5 cards 30. Player wins on 6 cards 31. Player wins on 7 cards 32. D.D.N. on hard 10 + 11 only 33. D.D.N on hard 9,10,11 only 34. Insure blackjacks only 35. Abort all special cases 36. Abort streak betting 37. Penetration by round 38. Number of players 39. Number of decks 40. Penetration to ? cards (redeal) 41. Penetration to ? rounds 42. Delay time (100th sec) 43. Table limit max. 44. Table limit min. |
(Y/N) – set to N 2. (Y/N) – set to N 3. (Y/N) – set to Y 4. (Y/N) – set to Y 5. (Y/N) – set to N 6. (Y/N) – set to N 7. (Y/N) – set to N 8. (Y/N) – set to N 9. (Y/N) – set to Y 10. (Y/N) – set to Y 11. (Y/N) – set to Y 12. (Y/N) – set to N 13. (Y/N) – set to Y 14. (Y/N) – set to Y 15. (Y/N) – set to N 16. (Y/N) – set to N 17. (Y/N) – set to N 18. (Y/N) – set to Y 19. (Y/N) – set to N 20. (Y/N) – set to Y 21. (Y/N) – set to N 22. (Y/N) – set to N 23. (Y/N) – set to N 24. (Y/N) – set to Y 25. (Y/N) – set to N 26. (Y/N) – set to N 27. (Y/N) – set to N 28. (Y/N) – set to N 29. (Y/N) – set to N 30. (Y/N) – set to N 31. (Y/N) – set to N 32. (Y/N) – set to N 33. (Y/N) – set to Y 34. (Y/N) – set to N 35. (Y/N) – set to Y 36. (Y/N) – set to Y 37. (Y/N) – set to N 38. set to 7 39. set to 8 40. set to 52 41. – set to 1 set to 2000 set to 2 |
Betting Strategy
Betting strategy was defined as flat betting for all players at a fixed unit.
Playing Strategy
The basic strategy as shown in the appendix was entered.
This strategy was confirmed by three different sources for these rules:
1. E.O. Tuck – “Blackjack – is there anything more to be said?”
2. C. Ionescu Tulcea – “A Book on Casino Blackjack”.
3. Jady Davis – “Blackjack for profit”
SIMULATION
The simulation was then allowed to run from approximately 17.30 hours Friday, December 7th, to 09.30 hours Monday December 10th. In that time 71,543,288 rounds of Blackjack were played.
Results
RESULTS OF BLACKJACK SIMULATION CONDUCTED
FROM 7.12.90 – 10.12.90 UTILISING R.W.C.U.B.E. v 4.0 |
||||
The following results were obtained from a computer simulation of the game of Blackjack:-
N.B It had been noted prior to the experiment that player 1 was malfunctioning by negative betting at high negative indices. All other player results may be considered valid. |
||||
ROUNDS
|
BET
|
WIN/LOSS
|
WIN/LOSS %
|
|
Player 1 |
71 543 288
|
150 514 484
|
-962 174
|
-0.64%
|
Player 2 |
71 543 288
|
157 170 128
|
-966 129
|
-0.61%
|
Player 3 |
71 543 288
|
157 169 434
|
-964 045
|
-0.61%
|
Player 4 |
71 543 288
|
157 170 430
|
-936 456
|
-0.60%
|
Player 5 |
71 543 288
|
157 178 882
|
-924 008
|
-0.59%
|
Player 6 |
71 543 288
|
157 177 314
|
-964 353
|
-0.61%
|
Player 7 |
71 543 288
|
157 179 974
|
-945 521
|
-0.60%
|
HOUSE |
71 543 288
|
1,093,560,646
|
6,662,686
|
0.61%
|
LESS PLAYER 1 |
943,046,162
|
5,700,512
|
0.6045%
|
“Blackjack Formula” calculation:-
Starting advantage = DA + V DA = Deck Advantage v = sum of the effect of the rule variations Deck advantage for an 8 deck game = -0.54% v = -0.064% |
||
therefore starting advantage | = -0.54% + – 0.064 | |
= -0.604% | ||
Calculation of v:- | ||
v = sum of – | no soft double = -0.091 no hold card = -0.113 double after split = +0.14 |
|
= -0.064 | ||
In relation to Vegas Strip rules where, dealer stands on soft 17
double down on any two cards
no double after split
split any pair
resplit any pair except aces
split aces receive only 1 card each
no surrender
dealer receives hole card
Deck advantage taken from Arnold Snyder’s book “The Blackjack Formula” cross checked with Peter Griffin’s – “The Theory of Blackjack”.
Chambliss and Roginski’s – “Playing Blackjack in Atlantic City”
Values used are for a 6 deck game rather than an 8 deck game, however, these should closely approximate the correct values to within 0.05%. Thus, the house edge for the game of Blackjack using Adelaide Casino rules, playing basic strategy was calculated empirically to be 0.604% +/- 0.05%.